Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease Burden and Nirsevimab Effectiveness in Young Children From 2023-2024.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2-1-2025
Identifier
DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.5572; PMCID: PMC11667569
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: During the 2023-2024 respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) season in the United States, 2 new RSV prevention products were recommended to protect infants in their first RSV season: nirsevimab and Pfizer's maternal RSV vaccine. Postlicensure studies are needed to assess prevention product impact and effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the epidemiology and disease burden of medically attended RSV-associated acute respiratory illness (ARI) among children younger than 5 years during the 2023-2024 RSV season with 3 prepandemic RSV seasons (2017-2020), estimate nirsevimab effectiveness against medically attended RSV-associated ARI, and compare nirsevimab binding site mutations among circulating RSV in infants with and without nirsevimab receipt.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study included prospective population-based surveillance for medically attended ARI with systematic molecular testing for RSV and whole-genome sequencing of RSV positive samples, as well as a test-negative case-control design to estimate nirsevimab effectiveness. The study was conducted in 7 academic pediatric medical centers in the United States with data from RSV seasons (September 1 through April 30) in 2017 through 2020. Participants were children younger than 5 years with medically attended ARI.
EXPOSURE: For the nirsevimab effectiveness analyses, nirsevimab receipt among infants younger than 8 months as of or born after October 1, 2023.
MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: Medically attended RSV-associated ARI.
RESULTS: Overall, 28 689 children younger than 5 years with medically attended ARI were enrolled, including 9536 during September 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024, and 19 153 during the same calendar period of 2017-2020. Of these children, 16 196 (57%) were male, and 12 444 (43.4) were female; the median (IQR) age was 15 (6-29) months. During 2023-2024, the proportion of children with RSV was 23% (2199/9490) among all medically attended episodes, similar to 2017-2020. RSV-associated hospitalization rates in 2023-2024 were similar to average 2017-2020 seasonal rates with 5.0 (95% CI, 4.6-5.3) per 1000 among children younger than 5 years; the highest rates were among children aged 0 to 2 months (26.6; 95% CI, 23.0-30.2). Low maternal RSV vaccine uptake precluded assessment of effectiveness. Overall, 10 of 765 case patients (1%) who were RSV positive and 126 of 851 control patients (15%) who were RSV negative received nirsevimab. Nirsevimab effectiveness was 89% (95% CI, 79%-94%) against medically attended RSV-associated ARI and 93% (95% CI, 82%-97%) against RSV-associated hospitalization. Among 229 sequenced specimens, there were no differences in nirsevimab binding site mutations by infant nirsevimab receipt status.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This analysis documented the continued high burden of medically attended RSV-associated ARI among young children in the US. There is a potential for substantial public health impact with increased and equitable prevention product coverage in future seasons.
Journal Title
JAMA Pediatr
Volume
179
Issue
2
First Page
179
Last Page
187
MeSH Keywords
Humans; Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections; Infant; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Female; Male; Prospective Studies; United States; Child, Preschool; Antiviral Agents; Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human; Cost of Illness; Infant, Newborn; Case-Control Studies
PubMed ID
39652359
Keywords
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections; Humanized Monoclonal Antibodies; Prospective Studies; United States; Antiviral Agents; Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human; Cost of Illness; Infant, Newborn; Case-Control Studies
Recommended Citation
Moline HL, Toepfer AP, Tannis A, et al. Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease Burden and Nirsevimab Effectiveness in Young Children From 2023-2024 [published correction appears in JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Feb 1;179(2):223. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.6442.]. JAMA Pediatr. 2025;179(2):179-187. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.5572
Comments
Erratum in