Measuring Self-Efficacy in the Context of Pediatric Diabetes Management: Psychometric Properties of the Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-1-2018
Identifier
DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx094; PMCID: PMC5896602
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale (SED) is a widely used measure of diabetes-specific self-efficacy with three subscales: diabetes-specific self-efficacy (SED-D), medical self-efficacy (SED-M), and general self-efficacy (SED-G). The present study examined the factor structure and construct validity of the SED in 116 youth, aged 10-16 years (13.60 ± 1.87), with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
METHODS: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to examine the factor structure of the SED. Correlational and regression analyses examined relations between subscales and select outcomes.
RESULTS: CFA of the original three-factor structure provided a poor fit to the data. Factor models using rescaled items were tested. Results provided preliminary evidence for the SED-D as an independent one-factor model, and for a reduced one-factor model. Significant associations were found between the SED subscales, responsibility for diabetes management, and glycated hemoglobin.
CONCLUSIONS: Results provide limited support for the SED-D as a reliable and valid measure of diabetes-specific self-efficacy.
Journal Title
Journal of pediatric psychology
Volume
43
Issue
2
First Page
143
Last Page
151
MeSH Keywords
Adolescent; Child; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Male; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of Results; Self Efficacy; Self-Management
PubMed ID
29106615
Keywords
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of Results; Self Efficacy; Self-Management
Recommended Citation
Van Allen J, Noser AE, Littlefield AK, Seegan PL, Clements M, Patton SR. Measuring Self-Efficacy in the Context of Pediatric Diabetes Management: Psychometric Properties of the Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale. J Pediatr Psychol. 2018;43(2):143-151. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsx094
Comments
Grants and funding