Evaluation of commercial molecular diagnostic methods for detection and determination of macrolide resistance in mycoplasma pneumoniae

Sixto M. Leal, The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Arthur H. Totten, The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Li Xiao, The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Donna M. Crabb, The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Amy Ratliff, The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lynn B. Duffy, The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Karen B. Fowler, The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Emily Mixon, The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Jonas M. Winchell, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
Maureen H. Diaz, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
Alvaro J. Benitez, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
Bernard J. Wolff, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
Xuan Qin, Seattle Children's Hospital
Y. W. Tang, Weill Cornell Medicine
Mark Gonzalez, Emory University
Raj Selvarangan, Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics
Tao Hong, Hackensack University Medical Center
Edward Brooks, University of Texas at San Antonio
Steve Dallas, University of Texas at San Antonio
T. Prescott Atkinson, The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Xiaotian Zheng, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Jennifer Dien Bard, Keck School of Medicine of USC
Ken B. Waites, The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Abstract

© 020 American Society for Microbiology. We evaluated six commercial molecular tests targeting Mycoplasma pneumoniae, namely, the BioFire FilmArray respiratory panel (RP), the Meridian Alethia Mycoplasma Direct, the GenMark ePlex respiratory pathogen panel (RPP), the Luminex NxTAG RPP, the ELITech ELITe InGenius Mycoplasma MGB research use only (RUO) PCR, and the SpeeDx Resistance Plus MP assays. Laboratory-developed PCR assays at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were used as reference standards. Among 428 specimens, 212 were designated confirmed positives for M. pneumoniae. The highest clinical sensitivities were found with the InGenius PCR (99.5%) and the FilmArray RP (98.1%). The Resistance Plus MP identified 93.3% of the confirmed-positive specimens, whereas 83.6, 64.6, and 55.7% were identified by the ePlex RPP, NxTAG RPP, and Mycoplasma Direct assays, respectively. There was no significant difference between the sensitivity of the reference methods and that of the FilmArray RP and InGenius assays, but the remaining four assays detected significantly fewer positive specimens (P<0.05). Specificities of all assays were 99.5 to 100%. The Resistance Plus MP assay detected macrolide resistance in 27/33 specimens, resulting in a sensitivity of 81.8%. This study provides the first large-scale comparison of commercial molecular assays for detection of M. pneumoniae in the United States and identified clear differences among their performance. Additional studies are necessary to explore the impact of various test performances on patient outcome.