Response to Open Peer Commentaries "Rethinking the Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Foundations of Informed Consent and Shared Decision-Making for Brain Death Determination".
Document Type
Response or Comment
Publication Date
6-2020
Identifier
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1762796
Abstract
Comment on
- Informed Consent Should Not Be Required for Apnea Testing and Arguing It Should Misses the Point. Antommaria AHM, Sveen W, Stalets EL.Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(6):25-27. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1754517.PMID: 32441602 No abstract available.
- Requiring Consent for Brain-Death Testing: A Perilous Proposal. Bertino J, Potter J.Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(6):28-30. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1754515.PMID: 32441604 No abstract available.
Journal Title
The American journal of bioethics : AJOB
Volume
20
Issue
6
First Page
1
Last Page
1
MeSH Keywords
Apnea; Brain Death; Death; Decision Making; Humans; Informed Consent
Keywords
Apnea; Brain Death; Death; Decision Making; Informed Consent
Recommended Citation
Garrett JR, Berkowitz I. Response to Open Peer Commentaries "Rethinking the Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Foundations of Informed Consent and Shared Decision-Making for Brain Death Determination". Am J Bioeth. 2020;20(6):W1-W5. doi:10.1080/15265161.2020.1762796
COinS
