Engaging Clinical Nurses in Research: Nurses' Experiences Delivering a Communication Intervention in a Behavioral Oncology Clinical Trial.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-2019
Identifier
DOI: 10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000341; PMCID: PMC6404753
Abstract
Despite the recognized need for clinical nurses to engage in the conduct of research, little is known about their research experiences. This article describes the experiences of nurses who delivered the communication intervention in a behavioral oncology clinical trial for parents of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer. A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted of nurse interveners' (NIs') reflections on their experiences delivering the communication intervention. Ten data-generating questions were developed to guide NIs' reflections. Twelve NIs responded via verbal discussions. Six of these also provided written responses. Overall, nurses' experiences as interveners were powerful and positive, and included time and space to be fully present with patients and families. Nurse interveners identified barriers to their involvement in research related to time constraints, administrative support, physical space to privately conduct the intervention, and difficulties maintaining expertise with the intervention. The importance of ongoing collaboration between nurses, unit staff, leaders, and study teams was corroborated. An unexpected finding was the importance of reflective clinical research.
Journal Title
Nursing administration quarterly
Volume
43
Issue
2
First Page
175
Last Page
185
MeSH Keywords
Adolescent; Clinical Nursing Research; Communication; Humans; Neoplasms; Parent-Child Relations; Pediatric Nursing; Young Adult
Keywords
Adolescent; Clinical Nursing Research; Communication; Humans; Neoplasms; Parent-Child Relations; Pediatric Nursing; Young Adult
Recommended Citation
Landon L, Crane S, Nance S, et al. Engaging Clinical Nurses in Research: Nurses' Experiences Delivering a Communication Intervention in a Behavioral Oncology Clinical Trial. Nurs Adm Q. 2019;43(2):175-185. doi:10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000341
Comments
Grant support