Permanent cardiac pacing in children: choosing the optimal pacing site: a multicenter study.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2-5-2013
Identifier
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.115428
Abstract
Background: We evaluated the effects of the site of ventricular pacing on left ventricular (LV) synchrony and function in children requiring permanent pacing.
Methods and results: One hundred seventy-eight children (aged <18 years) from 21 centers with atrioventricular block and a structurally normal heart undergoing permanent pacing were studied cross-sectionally. Median age at evaluation was 11.2 (interquartile range, 6.3-15.0) years. Median pacing duration was 5.4 (interquartile range, 3.1-8.8) years. Pacing sites were the free wall of the right ventricular (RV) outflow tract (n=8), lateral RV (n=44), RV apex (n=61), RV septum (n=29), LV apex (n=12), LV midlateral wall (n=17), and LV base (n=7). LV synchrony, pump function, and contraction efficiency were significantly affected by pacing site and were superior in children paced at the LV apex/LV midlateral wall. LV dyssynchrony correlated inversely with LV ejection fraction (R=0.80, P=0.031). Pacing from the RV outflow tract/lateral RV predicted significantly decreased LV function (LV ejection fraction <45%; odds ratio, 10.72; confidence interval, 2.07-55.60; P=0.005), whereas LV apex/LV midlateral wall pacing was associated with preserved LV function (LV ejection fraction ≥55%; odds ratio, 8.26; confidence interval, 1.46-47.62; P=0.018). Presence of maternal autoantibodies, gender, age at implantation, duration of pacing, DDD mode, and QRS duration had no significant impact on LV ejection fraction.
Conclusions: The site of ventricular pacing has a major impact on LV mechanical synchrony, efficiency, and pump function in children who require lifelong pacing. Of the sites studied, LV apex/LV midlateral wall pacing has the greatest potential to prevent pacing-induced reduction of cardiac pump function.
Journal Title
Circulation
Volume
127
Issue
5
First Page
613
Last Page
623
MeSH Keywords
Adolescent; Atrioventricular Block; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Electrocardiography; Female; Heart Ventricles; Humans; Male; Models, Cardiovascular; Pacemaker, Artificial; Radiography, Thoracic; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
Keywords
Adolescent; Atrioventricular Block; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Electrocardiography; Female; Heart Ventricles; Humans; Male; Models, Cardiovascular; Pacemaker, Artificial; Radiography, Thoracic; Retrospective Studies; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
Recommended Citation
Janoušek, J., van Geldorp, I. E., Krupičková, S., Rosenthal, E., Nugent, K., Tomaske, M., Früh, A., Elders, J., Hiippala, A., Kerst, G., Gebauer, R. A., Kubuš, P., Frias, P., Gabbarini, F., Clur, S., Nagel, B., Ganame, J., Papagiannis, J., Marek, J., Tisma-Dupanovic, S., Tsao, S., Nürnberg, J., Wren, C., Friedberg, M., de Guillebon, M., Volaufova, J., Prinzen, F. W., Delhaas, T., . Permanent cardiac pacing in children: choosing the optimal pacing site: a multicenter study. Circulation 127, 613-623 (2013).
Comments
Erratum in