Adjusted Cutoff Scores Increase Sensitivity of Depression Screening Measures in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes.

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

11-1-2022

Identifier

DOI: 10.2337/dc22-0275

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure the acceptability and diagnostic accuracy of commonly used depression screening measures to determine ideal cutoff scores that sensitively identify depressive disorders in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred adolescents (12-17 years old) completed a reference standard, semistructured diagnostic interview and both long and short versions of five commonly used depression screening measures in the United States. To assess feasibility and acceptability, we used screener completion time and participant ratings, respectively. We used descriptive statistics, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, and paired-sample area differences under the ROC curve to assess each measure's diagnostic validity against our reference standard and to determine ideal cutoff scores for this sample.

RESULTS: Adolescents had a mean age of 15.0 ± 1.7 years, time since T1D diagnosis of 6.0 ± 4.1 years, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 8.9 ± 1.8%. Sixty percent of adolescents were male, 15% endorsed a current depressive disorder, and 15% endorsed lifetime suicidality. Measures demonstrated low sensitivity (0.33-0.67) to detect current depressive disorders using preexisting cutoff scores. However, adjusted cutoff scores increased sensitivity and reduced false negatives. All depression screening measures demonstrated "good" to "excellent" predictive validity, and the Children's Depression Inventory-2 Short version demonstrated significantly greater diagnostic accuracy than the Patient Health Questionnare-2 item version for adolescents.

CONCLUSIONS: Clinics should consider using screening measures with the greatest diagnostic accuracy as identified in this study and adjusting measure cutoff scores to increase sensitivity and reduce false negatives.

Journal Title

Diabetes care

Volume

45

Issue

11

First Page

2501

Last Page

2508

MeSH Keywords

Child; Humans; Male; Adolescent; Female; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Depression; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Sensitivity and Specificity; ROC Curve; Mass Screening; Reproducibility of Results

Keywords

Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Depression; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Sensitivity and Specificity; ROC Curve; Mass Screening; Reproducibility of Results

Link to Full Text
Library Record

Share

COinS