The risk of midgut volvulus in patients with abdominal wall defects: A multi-institutional study.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2017
Identifier
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.10.014
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The management of malrotation in patients with congenital abdominal wall defects has varied among surgeons. We were interested in investigating the risk of midgut volvulus in patients with gastroschisis and omphalocele to help determine if these patients may benefit from undergoing a Ladd procedure.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients managed at three institutions born between 1/1/2000 and 12/31/2008 with a diagnosis of gastroschisis or omphalocele. Patient charts were reviewed through 12/31/2012 for occurrence of midgut volvulus or need for second laparotomy.
RESULTS: Of the 414 patients identified with abdominal wall defects, 299 patients (72%) had gastroschisis, and 115 patients (28%) had omphalocele. The mean gestational age at birth was 36.1±2.3weeks, and the mean birth weight was 2.57±0.7kg. There were a total of 8 (1.9%) cases of midgut volvulus: 3 (1.0%) patients with gastroschisis compared to 5 patients (4.4%) with omphalocele (p=0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with omphalocele have a greater risk of developing midgut volvulus, and a Ladd procedure should be considered during definitive repair to mitigate these risks.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; retrospective comparative study.
Journal Title
Journal of pediatric surgery
Volume
52
Issue
1
First Page
26
Last Page
29
MeSH Keywords
Birth Weight; Digestive System Abnormalities; Female; Gastroschisis; Gestational Age; Hernia, Umbilical; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Intestinal Volvulus; Male; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors
Keywords
Gastroschisis; Ladd procedure; Midgut volvulus; Omphalocele; Babies; Newborn
Recommended Citation
Fawley JA, Abdelhafeez AH, Schultz JA, et al. The risk of midgut volvulus in patients with abdominal wall defects: A multi-institutional study. J Pediatr Surg. 2017;52(1):26-29. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.10.014
Comments
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:
III; retrospective comparative study.