Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-18-2024
Identifier
DOI: 10.1186/s13073-024-01411-7; PMCID: PMC11658439
Abstract
BACKGROUND: MECP2 Duplication Syndrome, also known as X-linked intellectual developmental disorder Lubs type (MRXSL; MIM: 300260), is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by copy number gains spanning MECP2. Despite varying genomic rearrangement structures, including duplications and triplications, and a wide range of duplication sizes, no clear correlation exists between DNA rearrangement and clinical features. We had previously demonstrated that up to 38% of MRXSL families are characterized by complex genomic rearrangements (CGRs) of intermediate complexity (2 ≤ copy number variant breakpoints < 5), yet the impact of these genomic structures on regulation of gene expression and phenotypic manifestations have not been investigated.
METHODS: To study the role of the genomic rearrangement structures on an individual's clinical phenotypic variability, we employed a comprehensive genomics, transcriptomics, and deep phenotyping analysis approach on 137 individuals affected by MRXSL. Genomic structural information was correlated with transcriptomic and quantitative phenotypic analysis using Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) semantic similarity scores.
RESULTS: Duplication sizes in the cohort ranging from 64.6 kb to 16.5 Mb were classified into four categories comprising of tandem duplications (48%), terminal duplications (22%), inverted triplications (20%), and other CGRs (10%). Most of the terminal duplication structures consist of translocations (65%) followed by recombinant chromosomes (23%). Notably, 65% of de novo events occurred in the Terminal duplication group in contrast with 17% observed in Tandem duplications. RNA-seq data from lymphoblastoid cell lines indicated that the MECP2 transcript quantity in MECP2 triplications is statistically different from all duplications, but not between other classes of genomic structures. We also observed a significant (p < 0.05) correlation (Pearson R = 0.6, Spearman p = 0.63) between the log-transformed MECP2 RNA levels and MECP2 protein levels, demonstrating that genomic aberrations spanning MECP2 lead to altered MECP2 RNA and MECP2 protein levels. Genotype-phenotype analyses indicated a gradual worsening of phenotypic features, including overall survival, developmental levels, microcephaly, epilepsy, and genitourinary/eye abnormalities in the following order: Tandem duplications, Other complex duplications, Terminal duplications/Translocations, and Triplications encompassing MECP2.
CONCLUSION: In aggregate, this combined analysis uncovers an interplay between MECP2 dosage, genomic rearrangement structure and phenotypic traits. Whereas the level of MECP2 is a key determinant of the phenotype, the DNA rearrangement structure can contribute to clinical severity and disease expression variability. Employing this type of analytical approach will advance our understanding of the impact of genomic rearrangements on genomic disorders and may help guide more targeted therapeutic approaches.
Journal Title
Genome Med
Volume
16
Issue
1
First Page
146
Last Page
146
MeSH Keywords
Humans; Methyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2; Mental Retardation, X-Linked; Phenotype; Male; DNA Copy Number Variations; Female; Alleles; Gene Duplication; Genetic Heterogeneity; Child; Child, Preschool
Keywords
MECP2 duplication syndrome; Clinical severity; MRXSL; Survival; Tandem duplication; Terminal duplication
Recommended Citation
Pehlivan D, Bengtsson JD, Bajikar SS, et al. Structural variant allelic heterogeneity in MECP2 duplication syndrome provides insight into clinical severity and variability of disease expression. Genome Med. 2024;16(1):146. Published 2024 Dec 18. doi:10.1186/s13073-024-01411-7
Comments
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
Publisher's Link: https://genomemedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13073-024-01411-7