Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-4-2026
Identifier
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofag088; PMCID: PMC12978529
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and SARS-CoV-2 can cause acute respiratory failure in children. We compared characteristics and outcomes of children aged < 2 years with respiratory failure from infection with RSV, SARS-CoV-2, or both viruses.
METHODS: We used data from a US pediatric respiratory virus hospitalization surveillance network including children with ICU admission for acute respiratory failure (receiving high-flow oxygen or mechanical ventilation) with RSV and/or SARS-CoV-2 during November 2023-March 2024. Demographic, clinical characteristics, and hospitalization outcomes were stratified by a positive test for RSV, SARS-CoV-2, or both viruses, and compared using chi-squared or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Multivariable analyses assessed independent associations between outcomes and infection.
RESULTS: Overall, 1406 children were included: 1253 (89.1%) for RSV, 105 (7.5%) for COVID-19, and 48 (3.4%) with RSV + SARS-CoV-2 detected. Children with RSV or RSV + SARS-CoV-2 had lower median ages (3.9 and 5.4 months, respectively) compared with those with SARS-CoV-2 (8.8 months;
CONCLUSIONS: Critically ill children < 2 years of age infected with SARS-CoV-2 had more severe illness presentation and outcomes and were older compared with those with RSV and RSV + SARS-CoV-2 codetection. Most children were previously healthy, highlighting the need for prevention measures.
Journal Title
Open Forum Infect Dis
Volume
13
Issue
3
First Page
088
Last Page
088
PubMed ID
41822373
Keywords
COVID-19; pediatric; respiratory failure; respiratory syncytial virus
Recommended Citation
Simeone RM, Newhams MM, Zambrano LD, et al. Characteristics of Young Children Hospitalized With Acute Respiratory Failure From Infection With Respiratory Syncytial Virus, SARS-CoV-2, or Both, November 2023-March 2024. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2026;13(3):ofag088. Published 2026 Mar 4. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofag088


Comments
This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US. This article is a work of the United States government. Such works are not entitled to domestic copyright protection under U.S. law and are therefore in the public domain.