Document Type
Article
Publication Date
11-2018
Identifier
DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12711; PMCID: PMC6175652
Abstract
Background: To assess the change in rates of pediatric real-time or intermittent scanning continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use over the past 5 years, and how it impacts glycemic control, data from two registries were compared: the US-based type 1 diabetes Exchange Registry (T1DX) and the German/Austrian DPV (Prospective Diabetes Follow-Up Registry).
Methods: Registry participants aged≥1 year encompassed 29 007 individuals in 2011 and 29 150 participants in 2016. Demographic data, CGM use and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) were obtained from medical records.
Results: CGM use increased from 2011 to 2016 in both registries across all age groups, regardless of gender, ethnic minority status or insulin delivery method. The increase in CGM use was most pronounced in the youngest patients, and usage rates remain lowest for adolescent patients in 2016. For both registries in 2016, mean HbA1c was lower among CGM users regardless of insulin delivery method compared to pump only (P < 0.001) and injection only (P < 0.001), and CGM users were more likely to achieve glycemic target of HbA1c < 7.5% (56% vs 43% for DPV and 30% vs 15% for T1DX, P < 0.001). T1DX participants had a higher mean HbA1c compared with DPV despite whether they were CGM users or non-users; however, the difference was less pronounced in CGM users (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Pediatric CGM use increased in both registries and was associated with lower mean HbA1c regardless of insulin delivery modality.
Journal Title
Pediatric diabetes
Volume
19
Issue
7
First Page
1271
Last Page
1275
MeSH Keywords
Adolescent; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Child; Child, Preschool; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Female; Humans; Male; Registries; Wearable Electronic Devices
Keywords
continuous glucose monitoring; longitudinal analysis; type 1 diabetes
Recommended Citation
DeSalvo DJ, Miller KM, Hermann JM, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring and glycemic control among youth with type 1 diabetes: International comparison from the T1D Exchange and DPV Initiative. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19(7):1271-1275. doi:10.1111/pedi.12711
Comments
Grant support
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Publisher's Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/pedi.12711