Document Type
Letter to the Editor
Publication Date
7-2025
Identifier
DOI: 10.5811/westjem.48840; PMCID: PMC12342429
Abstract
This letter, signed by over 50 academic chairs of emergency medicine, urges the ACGME to reconsider a proposed mandate requiring all emergency medicine residency programs to adopt a four-year training model. The authors argue that current three-year programs are supported by data demonstrating equivalent educational and clinical outcomes compared to four-year formats. They criticize the flawed survey methodology underpinning the proposal, note the loss of milestone-based training flexibility, and highlight the lack of added scholarly or clinical value in the fourth year. The letter also outlines negative consequences for fellowship participation, workforce development, trainee debt, and diversity. The signatories advocate for maintaining the current flexible training model to preserve excellence, equity, and innovation in emergency medicine education.
Journal Title
West J Emerg Med
Volume
26
Issue
4
First Page
769
Last Page
772
MeSH Keywords
Emergency Medicine; Humans; Internship and Residency; Education, Medical, Graduate; United States
PubMed ID
40795015
Keywords
Emergency Medicine; Internship and Residency; Graduate Medical Education; United States
Recommended Citation
Hamilton RJ, Becker LB, Wolfe RE, et al. Letter of Concern from the Association of Academic Chairs of Emergency Medicine Regarding ACGME Proposed Changes. West J Emerg Med. 2025;26(4):769-772. doi:10.5811/westjem.48840


Comments
This is an open access article
distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by/4.0/ Publisher's Link: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/60t897jd#main